Friday, July 18, 2014

Twitter, baseball, and evidence-based practices

Maureen Fitzgerald
Communications Coordinator, ATTC Network Coordinating Office
Senior Editor, NIATx

Last month I attended a great workshop on science writing and communication skills for the 21st century. One of the featured speakers was Lee Aase, director of the Center for Social Media at Mayo Clinic. His workshop, “You Are Now the Media. Really” was about how social media is revolutionizing health care.

Aase got the Mayo Clinic started with social media, launching podcasts in 2005, Facebook in 2007, and Twitter in 2008. A TwitterChat about wrist surgery that Mayo Clinic hosted with USA Today (featuring the wrist recovery of Philadelphia Phillies outfielder Jason Werth) encouraged other people with similar wrist injuries to inquire about the surgery. Dr. Richard Berger, who pioneered this surgery (called the UT split), later wrote to Aase that several doctors had trained with him to learn the procedure because of the TwitterChat

Berger said, “Social media has driven this into practice in less than 2 years, when it takes 17 years on average!”

Could social media have the same effect on the spread of evidence-based practices in behavioral health?

Mayo Clinic also has a YouTube channel and several blogs. One of its most successful videos (with millions of views) was of an older couple playing the piano. You can watch the video and read the story of these “Octogenarian Idols” here.

Social media has been so successful that today Mayo Clinic has an entire department dedicated to it, the Social Media Health Network.

Aase says that before social media, the most effective communication channel for the Mayo Clinic was not paid advertising or TV spots, but word of mouth—patients referring one other to the clinic’s doctors.

Social media are the word-of-mouth of the 21st century.

In the 21st century environment of health care reform, behavioral health care organizations have to market their services and compete with one another. Social media, in all its forms—Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, and blogging, to name just a few—have become essential and affordable marketing tools.

Has your organization made the leap?

If you’re looking for ideas and inspiration, check out the four-part social media webinar series Marketing with Social Media on the NIATx website. The first is a presentation by Lee Aase similar to the one I attended.

Aase also offers some fun and informative resources on his  Social Media University, Global (SMUG) website. For example, Twitter101: Intro to Twitter is just under three minutes and gives a great overview. You’ll be happily tweeting away before you know it.  

Oh, and by the way, be sure to "follow" us on Twitter:

and "like" us on Facebook: 

…and we’ll be sure to follow you and like you back!

Thursday, June 26, 2014

NIATx principle #4: Getting ideas...from outside the country

Kim Johnson
NIATx Deputy Director
ATTC Co-Director (WI)

Those of you on the NIATx Facebook page know that I recently went to St. Petersburg, Russia, as part of a team put together by Stanley StreetTreatment and Resources (SSTAR), a treatment program in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. We were there working on a white paper about disseminating mobile health applications in Russia and the United States. While we were there, we presented at a conference with our Russian colleagues on the possible uses of mobile applications with people with behavioral disorders.

We toured a psychiatric hospital, three addiction treatment sites, and a couple of mobile outreach vans. What was most interesting to me was how much the treatment systems are alike. What seem like differences sometimes are really issues of translation. For example, the people that do the work of counselors and social workers in the U.S. are called psychologists in Russia, and the people they call social workers are people we would call recovery support specialists or something like that. Sometimes the language barriers were the biggest obstacle to seeing how much alike the two systems are.
One of the mobile vans used
for harm reduction and to
engage high-risk drug users.

But, I’m guessing you are more interested in what is different. So, given that language may have clouded my understanding, here are things that I thought were interesting differences.

First, the substance abuse providers envy our medical model! They do not have access to buprenorphine or methadone and have only begun to use Vivitrol. So while we lament the low utilization of medication and study mechanisms for increasing access to medication, they think we look good in comparison.

What I admired about their system was the strong focus on rehabilitation. Both their mental health system and substance abuse treatment system work with patients to help them develop skills and interests so that they can lead fuller lives through work and recreation.
Waiting area in a St. Petersburg
treatment facility. Look familiar?

The day we visited two addiction treatment facilities, most of the patients were participating in a citywide sports tournament, where the patients from the 18 treatment districts competed against each other in sports like soccer. What a great idea! Wouldn’t it be fun if you could organize a competition with other treatment programs in your area? Even if it was a bowling league or something where you didn’t have to worry so much about liability and injuries.

The Russian system does not have our version of confidentiality. If you want privacy or confidential treatment, you can pay for treatment yourself, and one of the sites we visited had both private pay and public patients. The driver’s license issue is interesting. In Russia, if you enter the public addiction treatment system, you lose your driver’s license for three years and may have repercussions at work. I think most see the potential loss of a driving license as a huge barrier to treatment entry. And it may be, because I didn’t discuss it with any patients. But our hosts did not see it that way. In Russia, in order to initially obtain a driving license, you have to have a sign off from a Narcologist (Addictionologist), a psychiatrist, a neurologist, and an eye doctor. One of the sites we visited primarily served people trying to get their licenses, so they did brief assessments and that was it. Since proving you do not a have a substance use or psychiatric disorder that would inhibit your ability to drive is part of getting your license, in the Russian mind losing it for having a substance use problem seems natural, not restrictive. When we talked about Russia treating driving as a privilege the response was “Nyet!” They didn’t see it that way. They were astounded by how easy it is to get a driver’s license here and how difficult it is to lose it (especially here in Wisconsin, the only state in the nation where a first time DUI is not a criminal offense!)
We had some time for sightseeing. One
of our stops was at the summer
palace of Peter the Great, Peterhof.

I wish we had more opportunity for international exchanges. In Europe, geographic proximity allows for easier exchange between countries, but how many of us have even been to a program in another state, let alone another country? Anyone else been to Russia and want to comment on their impressions? How about other countries? Think of the NIATx principle “Get ideas from outside the organization or field” and extend that to treatment systems in other countries. What do they do that would be fun to implement here? 

Kimberly Johnson, NIATx Deputy Director and ATTC Network Coordinating Office Co-Director served for seven years as the director of the Office of Substance Abuse in Maine. She has also served as an executive director for a treatment agency, managed intervention and prevention programs, and has worked as a child and family therapist. She joined NIATx in 2007 to lead the ACTION Campaign, a national initiative to increase access to and retention in treatment. She is currently involved in projects with the ATTC Network and NIATx that focus on increasing implementation of evidence-based practices, testing mobile health applications, and developing distance learning programs for behavioral health. 

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

States expanding access to technology for addiction treatment

Mike Boyle, Associate Researcher
University of  Wisconsin-Madison

For the past 18 months, NIATx, in collaboration with JBS International, has been involved in a SAMHSA-funded project to help a group of five states (Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, and South Carolina) and one county (San Mateo County, California) identify and implement new communication technologies for addressing substance use. The technologies focus on interventions for screening and brief intervention, treatment, and ongoing recovery support. It has been a great learning experience for the project team.

An important step in this process was identifying what technology platforms exist for addressing substance use. Also, the states wanted to know if research supports the use of the interventions. We found tremendous progress over the last decade in the development of new technology for behavioral health interventions. Several of the technologies have been subjected to extensive clinical trials with a variety of populations. And research  results indicate that interventions delivered via technology have equal or better results than services provided solely by a clinician.

Many of these technologies serve as “clinician extenders,” allowing for more efficient delivery of services. Interventions delivered through computers, smartphones, and tablets allow anytime access to treatment modules and/or recovery supports. These programs can provide reports to the clinician, allowing for monitoring of progress, adaptive treatment planning, and intervention as needed. They have the potential for increasing access by removing barriers to services and may lower the cost per episode of care.

The project also identified challenges and barriers to implementing the technologies. The biggest issue is how to reimburse providers for the services. The existing fee-for-service payment system could be used for telephone, telemedicine, or computer services such as “virtual worlds,” where a clinician delivers services directly to a patient in real time.
Payment mechanisms such as case rates or episode of care payments could work for services that patients can access on their own via the Internet. A case rate or episode of care payment can capture the organizational costs of using the technology, such as licensing or purchasing fees, training and support time, and monitoring time by clinicians.

Other challenges include competing priorities for the state and providers, incorporating the technology into the existing workflow, and potential resistance to the changes required.

Please join us for the free webinar on Tuesday, June 17 to find out more about these innovative technologies and what states are doing to implement them.

Adopting Innovative Technology to Support Recovery
Tuesday, June 17
1:00 ET/12:00 noon CT/11:00am MT/10am PT

Michael Boyle is an Associate Researcher at the Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies at the University of Wisconsin–Madison and provides consulting services. He was formerly President and CEO of Fayette Companies, a behavioral health organization located in Peoria, Illinois, and is the Director of the Behavioral Health Recovery Management project. Boyle recently served on a National Quality Forum committee charged with defining an episode of continuing care for a substance abuse treatment encounter. He has authored several articles and book chapters. His current activities include integrating mental health, addiction and primary care services, implementing evidence-based clinical practices within recovery oriented systems of care, and exploring technologies to support behavioral health treatment and recovery.

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Announcing the new!

Maureen Fitzgerald, Editor
ATTC Network

Just before we launched the new, improved, we invited people to take a sneak peak and give us some feedback. We wanted to make sure that the new site is doing what it’s been designed to do:

Make it easier for people to find what they’re looking for.

Because, we’ll admit—and you told us—it was getting hard to find things on the previous site.

And what better time to revamp our site than our 20th anniversary as a national resource for the addiction treatment and recovery services community? (Check out the History of the Network on the new site—it has a cool timeline feature that highlights key accomplishments of our first 20 years.)  

And what did our beta-testers have to say about the new site?

“User-friendly” and “Easy to navigate” were the two terms our beta testers used most frequently, often with exclamation points.

In particular, they like new site’s clean lines and the way the home page points users to some of the most popular ATTC resources: 

One beta tester was happy to discover the ATTC/NIATx Service Improvement Blog, (thank you!) now easily accessible from the Communications tab on the home page, along with the Addiction Science Made Easy research briefs and our e-publications, the ATTC Messenger and The Bridge.

Another beta tester appreciated that the role of the Network and “technology transfer” are both defined in a prominent spots on the new site.

“Gorgeous,” said one beta-tester. “A home run!” said another.
To make the new site as lean and clean as possible, some content had to go. You know how some professional organizers advise discarding or donating anything in your closet that you haven’t worn in a year? The web redesign applied a similar principle in taking inventory of the previous website’s pages. Many of them had note been accessed in several years, or had information that was out of date. 

One of the many things that we’re really excited about for the new site is that it’s optimized for mobile devices. That means that the pages change size for easy viewing on a tablet or a smartphone. While most of our beta-testers viewed this site on a desktop or a laptop, we anticipate that many more people will be using mobile devices to access in the near future.

Creating the new site with mobile-device users in mind helped the designers stay focused on the best way to present key pieces of information that you'll be looking for – in a restricted amount of screen space. They applied the same principle in using more white spaceto make it easier to click content, and to reduce the number of clicks required to get to desired content.

Let’s get back to the homepage on the new site for second: You’ll see three “slider” images, one each for, Recovery Month, and the NIDA/SAMHSA Blending Initiative. We selected these for the website’s “marquee” to highlight their importance to the ATTC Network mission. (By the way, Recovery Month is celebrating 25 years this year--be sure to show your support by posting your Recovery Month events on the site.) We’ll be changing the slider images regularly so you won’t get bored: stay tuned for a new series coming up later this year.

Now that we’ve given you a bit of info on the new site, we hope you’ll take some time to explore it, if you haven’t already. And let us know if you find any glitches. But we mostly want to know that it’s working for you…and that you can find what you’re looking for.


Send your comments on the new website to Dave Gustafson, Jr., at 

P.S. Visit the ATTC Network Facebook and Twitter sites to find out how you could win a $25.00 Amazon Gift Card by posting about!   

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Bridge Video Talk Show Recap: Getting Physicians on Board with SBIRT

Kim Johnson, MBA, MSEd

Co-director, ATTC Network Coordinating Office

Deputy Director, NIATx 

In the Spring 2014 issue of the The Bridge, the editorial board explores SBIRTas a way to promote the integration of substance use treatment into mainstream medical care.
Articles in this issue reflect their responses to the question posed by editor Paul Roman: “What could each of us be doing to enhance the spread of physician involvement in SBIRT?”

I had the privilege of moderating a discussion of Bridge editorial board members Mike Boyle, Louise Haynes, and Paul Roman during the Bridge Video Talk Show on May 20. They talked more about their views on getting primary care physicians on board with SBIRT. 

(The session will be available as a podcast—watch your email or the ATTC Network website for details.)

A few highlights from the show:

Lessons from EAP programs.
Paul Roman talked about how executive leaders in business and industry were slow to adopt EAP programs until these programs were presented as a way to take a "problem" off a supervisors’ hands. The problem, of course, was an employee whose absenteeism or performance issues suggested the need for substance abuse treatment. Expanding EAP programs to include other problems that could be affecting attendance or performance also increased buy-in from executive leaders. EAP programs were successful when they solved a problem for employers. Would physicians embrace SBIRT more widely if they perceived it as solving a key problem? (Hmmm…do I hear a NIATx principle here?)

Financial considerations often drive adoption of new practices.
Louise pointed out that The Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) established in the Affordable Care Act provides a financial incentive to hospitals to lower readmission rates. SBIRT in hospital settings has the potential to decrease expensive readmissions; maybe this would help to spread use of SBIRT.  Paul added that by getting people into treatment sooner, SBIRT offers physicians a way to reduce or prevent the expensive medical complications that so often accompany and are exacerbated by substance abuse.

What would Everett Rogers do? As we discussed dissemination strategies, Mike Boyle wondered why we haven't done a better job doing what research tells us works in terms of disseminating and adopting new practices.

Hello! I jumped up and grabbed my dog-eared copy of Roger’s Diffusion of Innovations text.

Here’s what we know and have known about innovation for years and years:  
  • It has to meet a need or solve a problem or do something better than what we have now. We didn’t need iPhones, for example, but they did so many cool things we couldn’t do before that they’ve been widely adopted.
  • It has to be easy to adopt.
  •  It really helps to to see other people using it and to copy what they are doing.
While I think SBIRT can offer all of these things, it isn’t necessarily portrayed that way.

Also, Mike and Paul both mentioned the idea of using a deliberate dissemination strategy that incorporates opinion leaders. Several audience members raised this issue. How many doctors do we have doing training and recommending that their colleagues do SBIRT?  Does it feel to physicians that people without knowledge of their daily practice are imposing an expectation on them? And isn’t that stuff part of what the nurse, not the doctor, does anyway? Why aren’t we selling nurses on the idea?

So…what do you think? If SBIRT is a key to integrated care, what do we need to do differently to have wider adoption?  For more information on SBIRT, visit the website of the National SBIRT ATTC -- there may be an SBIRT training coming up in your area soon.

Kimberly Johnson served for seven years as the director of the Office of Substance Abuse in Maine. She has also served as an executive director for a treatment agency, managed intervention and prevention programs, and has worked as a child and family therapist. She joined NIATx in 2007 to lead the ACTION Campaign, a national initiative to increase access to and retention in treatment. She is currently involved in projects with the ATTC Network and NIATx that focus on increasing implementation of evidence-based practices, testing mobile health applications, and developing distance learning programs for behavioral health.

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

May is Hepatitis Awareness Month: ATTC Training Resources

New medications now available and those coming to market for treatment of hepatitis C are the topic of this month’s (Thursday, May 15) Third Thursday iTraining: “Hepatitis C Treatment: What do I use?” Presenter Bruce Burkett, Executive Director and Founder of the HepC Alliance, will talk about the medications currently available, their success rates, and issues related to access to and cost of the medications.

The iTraining complements the feature article “Availability and Use of HCV Services in Substance Use Treatment Settings” in this month’s ATTC Messenger, written Meg Brunner, Librarian for the Clinical Trials Network (CTN) Dissemination Library. Brunner shares the results of two health services research studies on the hepatitis C virus (HCV). These studies, conducted by the National Drug Abuse Treatment CTN, identified the need for the substance abuse treatment system to increase screening, counseling, and information services for patients with or at risk of contracting HCV.

To help meet that need, the National ATTC Viral Hepatitis Workgroup will soon be offering online and face-to-face options for training on HCV. The workgroup includes representatives from each of the 10 regional centers and is developing HCV training products specifically for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). The courses target staff at FQHCs but are open to anyone interested in learning more about HCV prevention and treatment.
The first product is a 90-minute introductory online course that will be available in late summer 2014 on the ATTC HealthEKnowledge site. It consists of four modules covering: 1) populations at risk; 2) an introduction to the disease; 3) screening processes; and 4) treatment options. In addition, each regional ATTC is gathering region-specific HCV resources that will be incorporated into a Regional Resources section at the close of the course. The online course is expected to go live later this summer.

A second face-to-face training option, modeled on the online course, will offer more in-depth training on HCV. “It’s designed to build on the HealthEKnowledge course and targets behavioral health providers at FQHCs,” says curriculum developer Diana Padilla, Cultural Proficiency Program Manager for Training at National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

"While the online course presents an overview of HCV, the face-to-face training will provide a more comprehensive review of the epidemiology of HCV and its impact on society, and risk groups,” says Padilla. “It will also promote screening and diagnostic testing and will discuss treatment options and linkage to HCV health care, which varies from region to region.”  The face-to-face training will include a section on telemedicine and telehealth options in rural and remote areas of the country. “We are planning to pilot a first draft of the training in July, with Training of the Trainer events to follow later for all the regional centers,” says Padilla.

Watch your email or check the ATTC website for more news about these new training resources from the National ATTC Viral Hepatitis Workgroup!

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Converting crisis calls to treatment: Tips from the Iowa Office of Problem Gambling Treatment and Prevention

Maureen Fitzgerald
Editor, ATTC Network Coordinating Office and NIATx

Webinar 3 in the  ATTC Network’s Problem Gambling Webinar series on Thursday, May 8,  features Dr. Nancy Petry, who will be discussing changes to the DSM5 and how they'll affect treatment for problem gambling. 
The webinar series a great lead-in to the 11th Annual Midwest Conference on Problem Gambling and Substance Abuse: Prevention, Treatment & Recovery in an Era of Change (June 25-27, 2014, Kansas City).
The Mid-America Addiction Technology Transfer Center sponsors this event in partnership with addiction treatment and problem gambling treatment programs from Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and Oklahoma. The conference features national experts on problem gambling—the 2014 agenda includes Dr. H. Westley Clark and Dr. David-Mee Lee, among others—along with updates from the states on their problem gambling initiatives.

The Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) Office of Problem Gambling Treatment and Prevention (IGTPP) has presented regularly at the conference. Their presentation at the 2013 conference shared the results of their project to convert crisis calls to treatment through a series of NIATx change projects.

A few facts about Iowa: In 1986, Iowa was the first state in the country to establish a state-funded gambling treatment program. A portion of gambling profits from casinos and the state lottery were allocated for problem gambling treatment. In 1987, Iowa became the first state to offer 1-800-BETS OFF, a free state-wide problem gambling helpline. That helpline receives 4,000 calls per year. Today, Iowa is home to 18 casinos licensed by the state’s Racing and Gaming Commission, three tribal casinos, 2,400 lottery outlets, 3,350 social and charitable gaming licenses, along with many Internet and other illegal gaming. Gambling is easily available in any one of the state’s 99 counties.  IDPH contracts with 11 local treatment agencies to provide problem gambling prevention, treatment and recovery support services in 11 service regions across the state.

NIATx has been widely used in Iowa's substance use treatment organizations; from 2005 to 2007, the state was party of a CSAT-funded state/payer pilot project to test NIATx strategies to improve access to and retention in substance abuse treatment. Iowa providers across the state continued to participate in NIATx projects in subsequent years. A project launched in 2009 applied NIATx change strategies to the state’s problem gambling program. Bob Kerksieck, Health Facilities Surveyor IGTPP shared results of that project at the 2013 Midwest Conference on Problem Gambling.

100 walk-through phone calls: To get an idea of how Iowa’s funded gambling treatment programs were responding to Bets Off Helpline referrals, Kerksieck, along with the project coach Janet Zwick and Mark Vander Linden (then program manager for IGTPP), made more than 100 phone calls over a one-year period to the helpline, posing as problem gamblers.
This exercise provided a wealth of information.  “Many calls went well, but on the first round, one-third of the calls didn’t get through to anyone at the program. Some might have gone better. Some messages were never returned,” says Kerksieck.  And for the majority of the cases, there was no counselor available within two days of the call.

Eric Preuss, current program manager at IGTPP, recommends that any agency interested in starting a NIATx change project start with the phone-walk through. “The first phone call is especially critical for problem gamblers. Most problem gamblers present as crisis callers, so engaging them on the phone when they’re seeking treatment is critical.”

Based on the data gathered from the 100 phone walk-throughs and other activities, the change team tested implementing a “warm handoff” from the 1-800-BETS-Off helpline directly to treatment programs, for all calls made from 8am to 8pm, Monday-Friday.

In a warm phone hand-off, a caller gets connected directly to a counselor at a treatment program. Instead of giving caller’s the phone number to call a local treatment program, or transferring the caller and hanging up, the helpline would transfer the caller and stay on the line, telling the program, “Hello, I have Jane on the phone. She called about a gambling problem and would like to talk to someone. Do you have a counselor available who can talk to him/her?” 

“Before this change, 57% of callers asking for help were actually connecting with a live person at a treatment agency,” says Kerksieck. “After this change, that number increased to 83%.”

Adds Preuss, “We’re encouraging our programs to have a counselor available to handle problem gambler crisis calls 24/7. We recommend no waiting and no call-backs, and contracts now have a minimum requirement that a qualified counselor responds to a helpline call within 90 minutes of the initial call, 24 hours per day and 7 days per week.”  

Preuss and his team continually evaluate the phone answering processes. A recent NIATx change project took a look at calls that appeared to be originating from outside the state of Iowa. These calls were automatically forwarded to the national problem gambling helpline.

“We learned that many of those callers were actually Iowa residents using mobile phone numbers with non-Iowa area codes,” says Preuss. “We decided to unblock the out-of-state callers and then saw a 25% increase in callers.”  As part of a this change project, Helpline staff now ask callers to identify what state they’re calling from, and if from Iowa, what county. “We can then refer people who are calling from out of state to an appropriate resource in their area.
Kerksieck’s 2013 conference presentation also shared results of a NIATx change project to reduce intake paperwork. “In the first year of our NIATx problem gambling project, we also took a look at the problem gambling screening tool our providers were using. The most common screen at the time was a 20-question screen, which was just too long to get substance abuse treatment programs to adopt,” says Kerksieck.  After testing other screening tools, the department selected the BBGS screen, a three-question test that has been endorsed by researchers and the National Center for Responsible Gaming (NCRG). This resulted in a significant increase in problem gambling referrals from substance abuse treatment programs that adopted the BBGS.

(Read how Substance Abuse Services Center (SASC) in Dubuque, Iowa decreased assessment paperwork and increased client admissions to gambling treatment by 164%.)

A shorter screen was one of the changes that helped streamline the intake process, says Preuss. “The net effect of the project reduced paperwork at treatment programs from up to four hours for an intake to less than one hour.”  However, it appears that some programs are increasing the amount of paperwork for an admission. “This would be a prime area for a NIATx booster with programs,” he comments.

The Iowa programs are also encouraged to keep time slots open the next day for problem gamblers who call the night before. Some programs still have problematic waiting lists for both substance abusers and problem gamblers.  “Our NIATx data informed us that this is more problematic for problem gamblers because their referral is usually crisis-oriented and not forced by corrections, employer, etc.” says Preuss. “If the crisis has passed, the client is more likely to no-show.” 

One of the most successful changes tested was offering the first four sessions free of charge.

 “Our contracts mandate programs offer a sliding fee schedule, but allow the programs to decide how to set their sliding fee schedule,” says Kerksieck. “By the time you’ve got the nerve to call a helpline, you’re usually in severe financial straits and may balk at having to pay for those first sessions. We figured that these people had already paid a huge down payment on their treatment, since their gambling losses were in part funding our treatment programs.”

Kerksieck added, “All the programs that used this NIATx change cycle got a significant bump up in both admissions and continuation by offering the first four sessions free. One program reported a 300% increase in admissions and one of the larger programs found that continuation (attending at least 4 sessions in the first 30 days of treatment) increased from 57% to 100%. ”

Preuss and Kerksieck are optimistic that the DSM-5’s new definition of problem gambling as an addictive disorder will increase awareness of problem gambling as a co-morbid condition. They’ve also noted changes in Medicaid, either due to the new definition or the ACA, leading to an increase in reimbursements for problem gambling treatment outside of current state funding. 

To find out more about how the DSM-5 changes for gambling will affect treatment, attend Webinar 3 in the ATTC Network’s Problem Gambling webinar series, this Thursday, May 8. Dr. Nancy Petry was a member of the American Psychiatric Association's Substance Use Disorders Workgroup for the DSM-5, and she led the subcommittee on behavioral addictions. In this webinar, she will outline the changes to gambling diagnosis and describe their impact for other behavioral addictions. She will also outline how the changes for gambling diagnosis are likely to impact the assessment and treatment of gambling problems in years to come. 

Preuss says that the potential increase in clients seeking treatment for problem gambling underscores the need for the department and contracted providers to continually examine their processes. “We ask for regular feedback from providers on how their systems are working,” he comments. “The NIATx tools are used by providers to continually monitor and improve access to problem gambling treatment services ”

 NIATx has been a “win-win” for providers and those seeking problem gambling treatment services, concludes Preuss. “Integrating the NIATx philosophy and tools into IGTPP has improved client access to care, and has given us a foundation for continual process evaluation and improvement. Every program wants to increase client admissions and continuation.”

For more information on the Iowa’s Office of Problem Gambling Treatment and Prevention (IGTPP), contact:

Eric M. Preuss, MA, IAADC, CCS
Program Manager
Office of Problem Gambling Treatment and Prevention
Iowa Department of Public Health
Division of Behavioral Health

Bob Kerksieck, LMSW, IAADC
Health Facilities Surveyor
Office of Problem Gambling Prevention and Treatment
Iowa Department of Public Health
Division of Behavioral Health